data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1c/99d1ca763579228fad124aafab16ad5ea496563b" alt="image0111"
Last week, I read Nancy Atwell’s engaging introduction to her book
In the Middle
(1998) that gave a glimpse into the in-the-trench action of writer’s
workshop with her students. Atwell takes readers on her evolutionary
journey from first-year-teacher, imposing fairly strict parameters on
her students’ writing, to a later version of herself as writing teacher,
giving her students free reign in regards to both the content of their
writing and the genre. It was refreshing to read about the success she
saw when she let her students have free reign to write. It was
interesting to contrast this to the approach of Shelley Peterson in her
book
Writing Across the Curriculum,
who feels that teachers should set parameters for content and allow
creativity to exist within the parameters for form. Although I haven’t
yet had a chance to test either approach, I feel that I would subscribe
to Peterson’s approach over Atwell’s, as I have seen the befuddlement of
students when given complete
carte blanche to pursue any avenue they choose in their writing.
At the end of her introduction, Atwell talks about how she morphed
into a teacher who would practise the art of her own writing (by her own
admission, a laboured process for her) on an overhead in front of her
students. This practice struck me as a wonderful way to show the hard
work of writing and demonstrate that teachers are also developing as
writers while also teaching how to write at the same time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57b1d/57b1db75579b485be9b8ba85845cb316ad107207" alt="Writer to Acquisitions Editor: 'Yes, I'm greatly influenced by others' writings ... particularly checks written by editors.'"
Further,
both Atwell and Peterson write about offering students the goal of
publishing their work outside the classroom as an incentive for students
to produce polished writing. This isn’t an approach I have seen
teachers use recently. I remember this opportunity when I was in school
in the 1980s and wonder why it has fallen out of use. Could this be a
driving force for pushing students to become better writers?
Overall, Atwell’s piece struck me as the story of the evolution of a
teacher of writing who had to power through her own fears about how to
teach, taking risks, and being a slow and challenged writer herself.
No comments:
Post a Comment